Currently PF is only ever used for lost item processing fees. This patch
alters the end user faceing description to clarify that.
Note: It may be nice to make the code more descriptive too at some
point, but that can happen in another bug in my opinion.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
[%- CASE 'FOR' -%]<span>Forgiven</span>
[%- CASE 'FFOR' -%]<span>Fine forgiven</span>
[%- CASE 'LR' -%]<span>Lost item fee refund</span>
- [%- CASE 'PF' -%]<span>Processing fee</span>
+ [%- CASE 'PF' -%]<span>Lost item processing fee</span>
[%- CASE 'PAY' -%]<span>Payment</span>
[%- CASE 'WO' -%]<span>Writeoff</span>
[%- CASE 'C' -%]<span>Credit</span>
[% CASE 'FOR' %]Forgiven
[% CASE 'FFOR' %]Fine forgiven
[% CASE 'LR' %]Lost item fee refund
- [% CASE 'PF' %]Processing fee
+ [% CASE 'PF' %]Lost item processing fee
[% CASE 'PAY' %]Payment
[% CASE 'WO' %]Writeoff
[% CASE 'C' %]Credit